A Multidisciplinary Protocolized Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Management: A Retrospective Before-After Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) management reduces rates of adverse complications. DESIGN: A retrospective before-after study. SETTING: A tertiary-care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair; data were stratified into before-protocol implementation (group 1: 2015-2018) and after-protocol implementation (group 2: 2019-2022) groups. INTERVENTION: The protocol details the workflow for vascular surgery, anesthesia, emergency department, and operating room staff for a rAAA case; training was accomplished through yearly workshops. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause morbidity and other major complications. Differences in postoperative complication rates between groups were assessed using Pearson's χ2 test. Of the 77 patients included undergoing rAAA repair, 41 (53.2%) patients were in group 1, and 36 (46.8%) patients were in group 2. Patients in group 2 had a significantly shorter median time to incision (1.0 v 0.7 hours, p = 0.022) and total procedure time (180.0 v 160.5 minutes, p = 0.039) for both endovascular and open repair. After protocol implementation, patients undergoing endovascular repair exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (46.2% v 20.0%, p = 0.048), all-cause morbidity (65.4% v 44.0%, p = 0.050), and renal complications (15.4% v 0.0%, p = 0.036); patients undergoing open repair for a rAAA exhibited significantly lower rates of mortality (53.3% v 27.3%, p = 0.018) and bowel ischemia (26.7% v 0.0%, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol for the management of a rAAA may reduce rates of adverse complications and improve the quality of care.

Virtual Reality: The Future of Invasive Procedure Training?

Invasive procedures are associated with adverse events that are both hazardous to patients and expensive to treat. A trainee is expected to perform complex sterile invasive procedures in a dynamic environment under time pressure while maintaining patient safety at the highest standard of care. For mastery in performing an invasive procedure, the automatism of the technical aspects is required, as well as the ability to adapt to patient conditions, anatomic variability, and environmental stressors. Virtual reality (VR) simulation training is an immersive technology with immense potential for medical training, potentially enhancing clinical proficiency and improving patient safety. Virtual reality can project near-realistic environments onto a head-mounted display, allowing users to simulate and interact with various scenarios. Virtual reality has been used extensively for task training in various healthcare-related disciplines and other fields, such as the military. These scenarios often incorporate haptic feedback for the simulation of physical touch and audio and visual stimuli. In this manuscript, the authors have presented a historical review, the current status, and the potential application of VR simulation training for invasive procedures. They specifically explore a VR training module for central venous access as a prototype for invasive procedure training to describe the advantages and limitations of this evolving technology.

Overview of the Interatrial Septum: Review of Cardiac Nomenclature for Transseptal Puncture.

Transseptal puncture is an increasingly common procedure undertaken to gain access to the left side of the heart during structural heart disease interventions. Precision guidance during this procedure is paramount to ensure success and patient safety. As such, multimodality imaging, such as echocardiography, fluoroscopy, and fusion imaging, is routinely used to guide safe transseptal puncture. Despite the use of multimodal imaging, there is currently no uniform nomenclature of cardiac anatomy between the various imaging modes and proceduralists, and echocardiographers tend to use imaging modality-specific terminology when communicating among the various imaging modes. This variability in nomenclature among imaging modes stems from differing anatomic descriptions of cardiac anatomy. Given the required level of precision in performing transseptal puncture, a clearer understanding of the basis of cardiac anatomic nomenclature is required by both echocardiographers as well as proceduralists; enhanced understanding can help facilitate communication across specialties and possibly improve communication and safety. In this review, the authors highlight the variation in cardiac anatomy nomenclature among various imaging modes.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of general versus regional anesthesia for lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA) has remained high. Studies investigating the influence of the anesthetic modality on the postoperative outcomes have yielded conflicting results. The aim of our study was to assess the effects of regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia on postoperative complications for patients undergoing LEA. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 1990 to 2022 for studies investigating the effect of the anesthetic modality on the postoperative outcomes after LEA. Regional anesthesia (RA) included neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks. The outcomes included 30-day mortality, respiratory failure (unplanned postoperative intubation, failure to wean, mechanical ventilation >24 hours), surgical site infection, cardiac complications, urinary tract infection, renal failure, sepsis, venous thrombosis, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Of the 25 studies identified, we included 10 retrospective observational studies with 81,736 patients, of whom 69,754 (85.3%) had received general anesthesia (GA) and 11,980 (14.7%) had received RA. In the GA group, 50,468 patients were men (63.8%), and in the RA group, 7813 patients were men (62.3%). The results of the meta-analyses revealed that GA was associated with a higher rate of respiratory failure (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.80; P = .02) and sepsis (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.33; P < .0001) compared with RA. No differences were found in postoperative 30-day mortality, surgical site infection, cardiac complications, urinary tract infection, renal failure, venous thrombosis, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction between the GA and RA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis have shown that GA could be associated with a higher rate of respiratory failure and sepsis compared with RA for LEA.

Timing of Blood Transfusions and 30-Day Patient Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Packed red blood cell transfusion during coronary artery bypass graft surgery is known to be associated with adverse outcomes. However, the association of the timing between transfusions in relation to discharge and 30-day postoperative outcomes has not been studied. The study authors investigated the impact of transfusion timing on 30-day surgical outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective review. SETTING: At a single tertiary-care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,481 adult patients underwent primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 2014 and December 2020. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The relationship between the timing of packed red blood cell transfusion (intraoperative, postoperative, or both) and 30-day postoperative outcome variables was calculated as an odds ratio. The influence of timing of transfusion on adjusted probability of postoperative complications was plotted against the lowest intraoperative hematocrit. The median age of the population was 67 years (60.0-74.0), body mass index was 28.5 (25.6-32.3) kg/m2, and 497 (20.0%) were female. A total of 1,588 (36%) patients received packed red blood cell transfusions; 182 (7.3%) received intraoperative transfusions, 489 (19.7%) received postoperative transfusions, and 222 (9.0%) received both (intraoperative and postoperative transfusions). Postoperative transfusion was associated with significantly higher odds of readmission (1.83 [1.32-2.54], p = 0.002) and heart failure (1.64 [1.2-2.23], p = 0.008) compared to patients with no transfusions; whereas intraoperative transfusions were not. CONCLUSION: The authors' data suggested that the postoperative timing of transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery may be associated with an increased incidence of 30-day heart failure and readmission. Prospective research is needed to conclusively confirm these findings.